header-logo header-logo

Securities litigation: where are we now?

194047
Compared to other jurisdictions, the UK has been slow to develop a route map for commencing & managing securities claims. Christian Tuddenham & Clare Hennessey explain why
  • An overview of the claims that can be brought by disgruntled investors under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.
  • The current status of jurisprudence and procedure in relation to these claims and future claims.

Securities litigation generally refers to claims brought by shareholders against listed companies, seeking to recover losses suffered due to a fall in the price of their shares, usually in the wake of allegations of mismanagement or wrongdoing and often against a backdrop of regulatory action.

These kinds of claims are seen relatively frequently in other jurisdictions including, notably, the US and Australia, but despite the availability of statutory redress, they have been slower to take off in the UK.

What claims can be brought?

The primary mechanism for claims in respect of publicly traded securities is statutory—pursuant to ss 90 and 90A of and

To access this full article please fill the form below.
All fields are mandatory unless marked as 'Optional'.
If you already a subscriber to New Law Journal, please login here

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll