header-logo header-logo

06 December 2024 / Avneet Baryan
Issue: 8097 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

Security for costs: sending & receiving

200297
When is security deemed received—on payment or on receipt of cleared funds? Avneet Baryan examines the case law
  • The Court of Appeal has confirmed the importance of compliance with court orders for the effective administration of justice.
  • Payment by cheque for security for costs is deemed received once payment is received in cleared funds, not when payment is made.

The recent case of Parsdome Holdings Ltd v Plastic Energy Global SL [2024] EWCA Civ 1293 makes for an interesting read for commercial litigators, particularly regarding compliance with security for costs orders. While the case underscores the critical importance of adhering to court orders to avoid a sanction such as strike out, there is also an interesting story about when security for costs is deemed received by the Court Funds Office (CFO).

The claimant British Virgin Islands (BVI) company, Parsdome, brought proceedings against the defendant, Plastic Energy, alleging that Plastic Energy induced it to enter into a deed of novation of a convertible loan agreement by fraudulent misrepresentations.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll