header-logo header-logo

Seeking possession

26 November 2009 / Annette Cafferkey
Issue: 7395 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Annette Cafferkey provides an update on housing, public law & human rights

Over the course of the last year or so there has been a spate of cases the effect of which increases the extent to which public sector landlords are open to challenge when seeking possession. The extent of this increase is not clear, however.

The first decision referred to below establishes that registered social landlords (RSLs) can subject to the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) and amenable to judicial review.

The remainder of the article covers two aspects: first, it traces the debate that has developed around the question of whether an unqualified entitlement to possession can be defeated in the county court using arguments based on the occupier’s personal circumstances; and, second, it outlines the tension that exists between European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and the domestic courts on this point.

RSLs—public authority

In R (Weaver) v London & Quadrant Housing Trust [2009] EWCA Civ 587,  [2009] All ER (D) 179 (Jun) the administrative court declared the London and Quadrant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll