header-logo header-logo

15 January 2009 / Deborah Edwards
Issue: 7352 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Seeking settlement

Deborah Edwards on how to avoid the pitfalls of Part 36 offers

In April 2009 the “new” rules governing Part 36 offers will have been in practice for two years. The most significant change has been the abolition of the need for parties to physically pay a sum of money into court to show that they were “good for the money”. The new rules allow any party to make a written off er to settle which can be in respect of any issue.

In the overwhelming majority of cases one and sometimes both parties will seek to conclude an action without it proceeding to a full hearing by making a Part 36 offer to settle. Under Part 36, the person who receives a Part 36 offer can accept “at any time” without the permission of the court, not just within a 21-day period but at any time after that and prior to commencement of trial, provided the party accepting the offer pays the other parties costs.

The implications

A claimant can no longer treat

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll