header-logo header-logo

Seeking settlement

15 January 2009 / Deborah Edwards
Issue: 7352 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Deborah Edwards on how to avoid the pitfalls of Part 36 offers

In April 2009 the “new” rules governing Part 36 offers will have been in practice for two years. The most significant change has been the abolition of the need for parties to physically pay a sum of money into court to show that they were “good for the money”. The new rules allow any party to make a written off er to settle which can be in respect of any issue.

In the overwhelming majority of cases one and sometimes both parties will seek to conclude an action without it proceeding to a full hearing by making a Part 36 offer to settle. Under Part 36, the person who receives a Part 36 offer can accept “at any time” without the permission of the court, not just within a 21-day period but at any time after that and prior to commencement of trial, provided the party accepting the offer pays the other parties costs.

The implications

A claimant can no longer treat

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll