header-logo header-logo

18 September 2014 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7622 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Selling out?

robins

Jon Robins raises a question over the Law Society’s latest advertising campaign

“Use a Professional. Use a Solicitor”. As far as campaign slogans, it is unlikely to inspire great passion within the hearts of the great British public. It is a sensible message, certainly not as tacky as Chancery Lane’s 2013 ad campaign (“Don’t get mugged by an insurer—use a solicitor”, attacked by the Association of British Insurers, with reason, as a “gross error of judgment”) or as plain bonkers as the “My Hero, My Solicitor” billboard campaign launched 10 years ago.

Reassurance?

The point of the latest advertising campaign might well be as much to reassure a jaded and sceptical constituency of the profession, High Street solicitors, that their professional body really does care, as opposed to a sincere attempt to shift the public perception of the profession.

At the heart of the campaign is a serious point. It identifies an arguably meaningful difference in the marketplace. “The growth of unregulated and do-it-yourself legal services means consumers are exposed to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll