header-logo header-logo

01 July 2010 / Peter Wake
Issue: 7424 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Sense & sensibility

Peter Wake applauds a common sense approach to liability

In the recent case of Esdale v Dover District Council [2010] EWCA Civ 409 the Court of Appeal delivered a helpful judgment in a simple personal injury claim; the facts of which will be familiar to local authorities across the country and their insurers.

The claimant was injured when she tripped and fell on a pathway forming the entrance to the block of flats where she lived. The council was the owner and occupier of both the block of flats and the pathway. The defect was a change in level in the path which the judge held to have measured between ¾ and one inch. The council inspected the path and adopted a general policy of repairing defects measuring more than ¾ inch. The path had been inspected on a number of occasions prior to the accident and the defect had not been regarded as requiring attention. The council’s inspector had reached this conclusion on the basis of a purely visual examination rather than

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll