header-logo header-logo

16 December 2016
Issue: 7727 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Sentence

R (Health and Safety Executive) v Conocophillips (UK) Ltd [2016] EWCA Crim 1594, [2016] All ER (D) 38 (Dec)

The Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, dismissed the defendant company’s application for leave to appeal against sentence, for three counts of being in contravention of a requirement imposed under a Regulation, contrary to s 33(1)(c) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974. In all the circumstances, an overall fine of £3m, which had taken account of the mitigation and credit for a plea of guilty, had not been in any way arguably manifestly excessive.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Firm enhances advisory capability with strategic risk specialist hire

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Insurance and reinsurance specialist joins policyholder disputes practice as partner

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll