header-logo header-logo

SENTENCING

14 March 2008
Issue: 7321 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Richards v National Probation Service [2007] All ER (D) 454 (Nov)

The offender was subject to a suspended sentence order (under CJA 2003, s 189) which imposed an obligation to undertake unpaid work. The conditions included a requirement to provide documentary evidence explaining any failure to perform unpaid work.

HELD In the context of community punishments, a responsible officer is entitled to set conditions that require the offender to inform the officer in advance if he knows he cannot keep an appointment to do unpaid work. This falls within the words “keep in touch” in CJA 2003, s 220(1)(a).

The officer may require that information to be in writing and to be supported by evidence from a third party. It is permissible for the conditions to provide that the officer may relax that requirement in the circumstances of a given case, so that the information is to be provided within a short period thereafter.

However, s 220 cannot be read as enabling the responsible officer to request the information ex post facto unless the request is to provide

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll