header-logo header-logo

08 March 2023
Issue: 8016 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Child law
printer mail-detail

Sentencing those who harm children

Convictions for child cruelty offences will lead to tougher punishments under revised sentencing guidelines.

The Sentencing Council published updated guidelines this week, reflecting the increased maximum penalties for child cruelty offences introduced under the Police, Crime, Courts and Sentencing Act 2022. The Act raised the maximum penalties from ten to 14 years in prison for cruelty, from ten to 14 years for causing or allowing a child to suffer serious harm, and from 14 years to life imprisonment for causing or allowing a child to die.

The council consulted on proposals to introduce a new very high level of culpability to capture the worst cases, which would help the courts take a consistent approach to sentencing. However, the guidelines do not change the factors of the high, medium and lesser culpability levels, the harm factors or the sentence levels for cases not falling into the new very high culpability category.

Under the revised guidelines, the sentencing range for causing or allowing a child to die goes up to 18 years in prison, and up to 12 years for causing or allowing a child to suffer serious physical harm.

Sentences for cruelty to a child including ill-treatment, abandonment or neglect range up to 12 years in prison.

The revised guidelines come into effect on 1 April 2023. The new maximum penalties will apply only to offences committed on or after 28 June 2022.

Sentencing Council chairman Lord Justice William Davis said: ‘Child cruelty offences are by their very nature targeted against particularly vulnerable people—children—and it is important that courts have up-to-date guidelines that reflect the penalties set by Parliament.

‘The revisions will ensure that the courts can reflect the new penalties consistently and transparently and will have available to them the full range of possible sentences when dealing with the worst cases of child cruelty.’

Issue: 8016 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Child law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll