header-logo header-logo

04 February 2010
Issue: 7403 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Separate appeals for bid rigging case

The Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) has said it will deal with the multiple appeals in the complex UK construction bid rigging case separately, and without making any preliminary rulings on common points of principle.

The case involves more than 100 construction firms and has posed a logistics puzzle for the CAT. Some 25 appeals on varying points will now be heard over a three-week period in late-June and July. In September 2009, the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) imposed fines totalling £129.2m on 103 construction firms found to have colluded with competitors to artificially inflate prices.

Suzanne Rab, antitrust and competition Counsel at Hogan & Hartson, said: “The CAT’s decision to deal with the appeals in the UK construction bid rigging case separately, rather than collectively, has stretched the CAT procedures and logistics handling. With 25 appeals in all on varying points, some appeals contesting penalty and others challenging liability, the CAT certainly has its hands full but has committed to deal with the cases in an expeditious and fair way.”

Issue: 7403 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll