header-logo header-logo

Separate businesses ban lifted

08 June 2015
Issue: 7656 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The prohibition on solicitors owning or having connections with outside businesses is to be abolished, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Board has decided.

The board voted last week to change the separate business rule, which prevents solicitors having links to separate businesses providing non-reserved legal services and therefore outside the remit of regulation. This means law firms will be able to compete on a level playing field with alternative business structures (ABSs) by owning, being owned by, actively participating in or developing links with separate businesses.

The board also voted to reform the rules on what activities law firms can undertake, which will make it easier for them to create one-stop shops for professional services. Instead, the regulator will focus on ensuring outcomes that protect the consumer.

The reforms were consulted on from November to February. They now need to be approved by the Legal Services Board and, if agreed, will become part of the Solicitors Handbook on 1 November.

David Greene, partner at Edwin Coe, says: “The policy lying behind the Separate Business Rule is to forestall confusion on the part of the consumer as to what part of a solicitor’s service is regulated.  

“We presume that another method will be prescribed to resolve that issue. For solicitors, the removal of the Separate Business restriction is undoubtedly good news. We have faced fierce competition for legal advice that falls outside reserved activities, such as will writing.  

“The removal of the restriction will go some way to redress the position; allowing solicitors to establish businesses offering ‘legal services’ that benefit from the branding of solicitor but fall outside the regulated environment.”      

Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, says: “We are levelling the playing field for all types of law firms, encouraging innovation and growth, while ensuring appropriate consumer protection. 

“This follows on from changes we made last year to open up the market to different business models and ‘one-stop shop’ services. We are now looking into what more we should do to give solicitors even more flexibility in future.”

 

Issue: 7656 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll