header-logo header-logo

Setting the Bar for CPD

27 January 2017 / Vanessa Davies
Issue: 7731 / Categories: Features , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail
nlj_7731_davies_1

Vanessa Davies explains why the new CPD scheme for established barristers is changing this year

“As with any other profession, the Bar must deliver, and be seen to be delivering, the best service to its clients and only the continual refreshing of skills and knowledge can achieve this.”

While I have been visiting circuits around the country to explain the new CPD scheme, I have begun my presentations with that quotation from Alastair Hodge from 5 Essex Court, writing in the Inner Temple 2016/17 Yearbook. Like Alastair, I firmly believe that CPD matters.

Updating knowledge & skills

A commitment to the constant updating of knowledge and skills is the hallmark of being a professional—doctors and engineers, for example, are all committed to CPD. Professional development is part of the “contract” we have with the public: we collectively warrant that we are on top of our game, in return for being seen as professionals.

The BSB has a statutory responsibility to assure the public, independently, that they can rely on barristers as being

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll