header-logo header-logo

Setting the Bar for CPD

27 January 2017 / Vanessa Davies
Issue: 7731 / Categories: Features , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail
nlj_7731_davies_1

Vanessa Davies explains why the new CPD scheme for established barristers is changing this year

“As with any other profession, the Bar must deliver, and be seen to be delivering, the best service to its clients and only the continual refreshing of skills and knowledge can achieve this.”

While I have been visiting circuits around the country to explain the new CPD scheme, I have begun my presentations with that quotation from Alastair Hodge from 5 Essex Court, writing in the Inner Temple 2016/17 Yearbook. Like Alastair, I firmly believe that CPD matters.

Updating knowledge & skills

A commitment to the constant updating of knowledge and skills is the hallmark of being a professional—doctors and engineers, for example, are all committed to CPD. Professional development is part of the “contract” we have with the public: we collectively warrant that we are on top of our game, in return for being seen as professionals.

The BSB has a statutory responsibility to assure the public, independently, that they can rely on barristers as being

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll