header-logo header-logo

Sex and the city

31 May 2007 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7275 / Categories: Features , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Can refusal to grant a sex shop licence breach the applicant’s human rights? Nicholas Dobson investigates

A case described by Baroness Hale as taking the prize “for the most entertaining name of any that have come before us in recent years”, Miss Behavin’ Ltd v Belfast City Council [2007] UKHL 19, [2007] All ER (D) 219 (Apr) concerned a council’s refusal to grant a sex shop licence in a district of Belfast. The council appealed against a decision of the Court of Appeal quashing this refusal because the council had not taken sufficient account of the claimant’s relevant rights under the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention).

JUDGES AND MODERN CULTURE

Judges nowadays are unlikely to ask (as once popularly perceived): “Who are the Beatles?” Indeed, they can often demonstrate an impressive awareness of modern culture. A case in point was Mr Justice Kitchen in his decision in the trade mark infringement case of Dearlove (trading and professionally known as ‘Diddy’) v Combs (trading and professionally known as ‘Sean ‘Puffy’ Combs’, ‘Puffy’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Commercial disputes practice bolstered by partner hire

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

London competition team expands with collective actions specialist hire

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Commercial dispute resolution team in London welcomes partner

NEWS
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
As the Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina, legal disputes are once again being resolved almost as fast as the athletes compete. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS's) ad hoc divisions, which can decide cases within 24 hours
back-to-top-scroll