header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Shaping the future of shareholder litigation

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
07 November 2025 / Sophie Ashcroft , Miranda Joseph
Issue: 8138 / Categories: Features , Company , Privilege
printer mail-detail
235044
Sophie Ashcroft & Miranda Joseph discuss a landmark Privy Council judgment & its implications for legal professional privilege in corporate litigation
  • Explains the origins of the shareholder rule, the difficulties in its application, and the reasoning behind the court’s decision to abolish it.
  • Considers the implications of the judgment for companies and their advisers.

The Privy Council’s decision in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd and others No 2 (Bermuda) [2025] UKPC 34 marks a pivotal moment in the evolution of legal professional privilege. In a judgment handed down on 24 July 2025, the board decisively rejected the long-standing shareholder rule: a doctrine that had allowed shareholders to access privileged legal advice obtained by a company. The board declared that it no longer forms part of the law of Bermuda, or of England and Wales.

Background to the dispute

The case arose from the 2021 amalgamation of Jardine Strategic Holdings Ltd and JMH Bermuda Ltd, forming Jardine Strategic Ltd (the company). Shareholders

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

Morrison Foerster—Jenny Galloway & Luke Rowland

Morrison Foerster—Jenny Galloway & Luke Rowland

Firm grows London practice with two partner promotions

Hogan Lovells—David Hansom

Hogan Lovells—David Hansom

Government contracts and procurement practice expands with London partner hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Looking back on the prorogation that never was
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
AlphaBiolabs supports The Christie Charity with £500 Giving Back donation
AlphaBiolabs has donated £500 to The Christie Charity through its Giving Back initiative, helping to support cancer care, treatment and research across Greater Manchester, Cheshire and further afield
Cautious support for proposed reforms to homebuying process
CILEX has called for a review of conveyancing fees and stronger regulation of the high-volume residential property sector, in its response to government proposals for homebuying reforms
Time to stir the pension pot?
Pension provision should be considered during all divorce proceedings in order to repair gender inequality, the Pension Policy Institute (PPI) charity and workplace pensions provider now:pensions have said
Government moving 'too far too fast' on cryptoassets?
‘Over-regulating’ the cryptoassets sector could stifle growth when the government brings regulations into force in 2027, a digital assets lawyer has warned
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll