header-logo header-logo

Shared intentions

28 June 2007 / Elizabeth Hicks , Sital Amin
Issue: 7279 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Has Stack v Dowden helped cohabiting couples whose relationships have broken down? Elizabeth Hicks and Sital Amin report

In 2001 there were 10 million married couples in England and Wales and over two million cohabiting couples. The law on resolving disputes between married couples is set out in the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973. The law on resolving property disputes between cohabiting couples arises from a detailed examination of complex trust principles and on resolving issues relating to personal property from contract law and principles of tort.

Although the Law Commission published a consultation paper, Cohabitation: The Financial Consequences of Relationship Breakdown, in May 2006 and the conclusions and final report are expected later this summer, it will not contain a draft Bill and—due to the apparent lack of funding on this issue—it is highly unlikely that there will be any changes in the law relating to cohabiting couples in the foreseeable future.
Many practitioners hoped that the House of Lords would take the opportunity to give much needed guidance in the quantification of a party’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll