header-logo header-logo

11 September 2008 / David Barry
Issue: 7336 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Off shore trust?

When can (or will) Jersey courts enforce English orders? By David Barry

In The Imk Family Trust (Mubarak v Mubarik And Ors) Royal Court Of Jersey (deputy bailiff of Jersey, unreported, 15 August 2008) the husband and wife married in 1983. The husband and wife, as settlors, created the IMK Family Trust (the trust). The trust is a Jersey discretionary trust. The beneficiaries are the settlors, their named children and other children/issue. The trustees are third party trustees.

The trust owns shares in a Bermuda company which is the holding entity for the husband's business. The parties separated and the husband excluded the wife as a beneficiary of the trust. Mr Justice Bodey made an order requiring the husband to pay to the wife the sum of £4.875m (the ancillary relief orders).

The wife brought an application for the husband to be barred from any further participation in the English proceedings. Bodey J made an order providing if the husband wished to continue to participate he had to write a letter to the trustees

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll