header-logo header-logo

11 September 2008 / David Barry
Issue: 7336 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Off shore trust?

When can (or will) Jersey courts enforce English orders? By David Barry

In The Imk Family Trust (Mubarak v Mubarik And Ors) Royal Court Of Jersey (deputy bailiff of Jersey, unreported, 15 August 2008) the husband and wife married in 1983. The husband and wife, as settlors, created the IMK Family Trust (the trust). The trust is a Jersey discretionary trust. The beneficiaries are the settlors, their named children and other children/issue. The trustees are third party trustees.

The trust owns shares in a Bermuda company which is the holding entity for the husband's business. The parties separated and the husband excluded the wife as a beneficiary of the trust. Mr Justice Bodey made an order requiring the husband to pay to the wife the sum of £4.875m (the ancillary relief orders).

The wife brought an application for the husband to be barred from any further participation in the English proceedings. Bodey J made an order providing if the husband wished to continue to participate he had to write a letter to the trustees

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll