header-logo header-logo

Shutting up shop

11 May 2012 / Richard Chapman
Issue: 7513 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Richard Chapman raises the alarm over county court counter closures

The counters of the county courts around England and Wales remain open all hours that the courts are open. The 2 April 2012 deadline, from when it was threatened that the counters would be closed, save for two hours a day, has come and gone. The extended consultation period has also come and gone. During that period, more than 300 responses were submitted, among which was the detailed response prepared by the Association of HM District Judges.

We viewed the proposed counter closure programme with alarm for a variety of reasons.

Workable safeguards

There must be a recognition that in order to make the county court system more efficient and to save costs that have to be saved, everyone involved will have to adapt to new procedures—HMCTS, county court users including litigants and legal representatives, and the judiciary. However, workable safeguards must be established for those court users who will struggle with what we are left with.

When I was articled back

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll