header-logo header-logo

04 February 2010 / Amy Purvis
Issue: 7403 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Significant others

Amy Purvis considers the significance of parentage in residence cases

The case of Re B (a child) [2009] UKSC 5, [2009] All ER (D) 207 (Nov) concerned a young boy (B) who had spent the majority of his life being raised by his maternal grandmother (GB). B had always maintained contact with both his mother (M) and his father (F). F, who had since married and had another child, applied for residence of B. This application was supported by M, despite the fact that she had herself made an unsuccessful application for residence. The Supreme Court (SC) granted a residence order in favour of GB. The determination of residence in this case required the court to make a balanced assessment as to the importance of genetic parenthood.

Re G

Preceding this judgment, however, one could have been forgiven if one assumed that the comprehensive judgment of Baroness Hale in Re G [2006] UKHL 43, [2006] All ER (D) 374 (Jul) had settled this issue. Re G concerned G and W, a lesbian couple who had

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll