header-logo header-logo

Sleeping satellite?

07 December 2012 / David Greene
Issue: 7541 / Categories: Opinion , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Could satellite litigation be avoided following the Jackson reforms, asks David Greene

It appears that the Ministry of Justice and the judiciary are bent on introducing the Jackson reforms next April. Perhaps the only doubt is as to the precise date in April.

Revisiting Jackson

The Court of Appeal revisited one of the elements of the Jackson reforms recently. In Simmons v Castle [2012] EWCA Civ 1288, [2012] All ER (D) 90 (Oct), the Court of Appeal reviewed its decision made in July in which it announced that, with effect from 1 April 2013, general damages in tort cases would be increased by 10% from current levels.

The way in which the Court of Appeal addressed this reform was itself novel, in that the reform was tagged onto a personal injury claim which had gone to the Court of Appeal on one element of the judgment at first instance. The increase in general damages had absolutely nothing to do with the point before the court, but the court used the occasion to make

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Moore Barlow—Jess Ready & Natasha Jones

Moore Barlow—Jess Ready & Natasha Jones

Commercial property and corporate teams expand in Southampton

Watershed—Rob Elliott

Watershed—Rob Elliott

Employment firm expands capability with experienced hire

Devonshires—Aoife Murphy & Mandeep Sahota

Devonshires—Aoife Murphy & Mandeep Sahota

Housing management and property litigation team bolstered by partner hires

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
Delays at HM Land Registry are no longer a background irritation but a growing source of professional risk. Writing in NLJ this week, Phil Murrin of DAC Beachcroft explores how the ‘registration gap’—now stretching up to two years in complex cases—is fuelling client frustration, priority disputes, and negligence claims
back-to-top-scroll