header-logo header-logo

Sleeping satellite?

07 December 2012 / David Greene
Issue: 7541 / Categories: Opinion , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Could satellite litigation be avoided following the Jackson reforms, asks David Greene

It appears that the Ministry of Justice and the judiciary are bent on introducing the Jackson reforms next April. Perhaps the only doubt is as to the precise date in April.

Revisiting Jackson

The Court of Appeal revisited one of the elements of the Jackson reforms recently. In Simmons v Castle [2012] EWCA Civ 1288, [2012] All ER (D) 90 (Oct), the Court of Appeal reviewed its decision made in July in which it announced that, with effect from 1 April 2013, general damages in tort cases would be increased by 10% from current levels.

The way in which the Court of Appeal addressed this reform was itself novel, in that the reform was tagged onto a personal injury claim which had gone to the Court of Appeal on one element of the judgment at first instance. The increase in general damages had absolutely nothing to do with the point before the court, but the court used the occasion to make

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll