header-logo header-logo

20 June 2014 / Dan Tench
Issue: 7611 / Categories: Features , Data protection , Freedom of Information
printer mail-detail

Slipping the net

Dan Tench assesses the implications of the right to be forgotten ruling in Google Spain

It has become a regular aspect of modern life to use internet search engines to look for and collate biographical information relating to other people. The purpose of such searches can range from commercial interest to journalistic investigation to idle curiosity.

Search engines called into question

The judgment from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on 13 May in Google Spain [2014] EUECJ C-131/12 called into question the legality of European-established search engines collating personal information and then facilitating such searches.

The case arose after a complaint that was brought against Google (that is the Spanish subsidiary and the US parent company) by a Spanish man, Sr Mario Costeja González, to the Spanish Data Protection Authority, the AEPD. His complaint related to the continued availability of information regarding certain unpaid debts that was published in a newspaper in Spain in the late 1990s including in its online version (where it continued to be available). The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll