header-logo header-logo

20 June 2014 / Dan Tench
Issue: 7611 / Categories: Features , Data protection , Freedom of Information
printer mail-detail

Slipping the net

Dan Tench assesses the implications of the right to be forgotten ruling in Google Spain

It has become a regular aspect of modern life to use internet search engines to look for and collate biographical information relating to other people. The purpose of such searches can range from commercial interest to journalistic investigation to idle curiosity.

Search engines called into question

The judgment from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on 13 May in Google Spain [2014] EUECJ C-131/12 called into question the legality of European-established search engines collating personal information and then facilitating such searches.

The case arose after a complaint that was brought against Google (that is the Spanish subsidiary and the US parent company) by a Spanish man, Sr Mario Costeja González, to the Spanish Data Protection Authority, the AEPD. His complaint related to the continued availability of information regarding certain unpaid debts that was published in a newspaper in Spain in the late 1990s including in its online version (where it continued to be available). The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll