header-logo header-logo

20 June 2014 / Dan Tench
Issue: 7611 / Categories: Features , Data protection , Freedom of Information
printer mail-detail

Slipping the net

Dan Tench assesses the implications of the right to be forgotten ruling in Google Spain

It has become a regular aspect of modern life to use internet search engines to look for and collate biographical information relating to other people. The purpose of such searches can range from commercial interest to journalistic investigation to idle curiosity.

Search engines called into question

The judgment from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on 13 May in Google Spain [2014] EUECJ C-131/12 called into question the legality of European-established search engines collating personal information and then facilitating such searches.

The case arose after a complaint that was brought against Google (that is the Spanish subsidiary and the US parent company) by a Spanish man, Sr Mario Costeja González, to the Spanish Data Protection Authority, the AEPD. His complaint related to the continued availability of information regarding certain unpaid debts that was published in a newspaper in Spain in the late 1990s including in its online version (where it continued to be available). The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll