header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
19 June 2008 / Paul Firth
Issue: 7326 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Community care
printer mail-detail

A slipshod execution

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Post Redknapp, police and magistrates should appreciate the gravity of requests for a search warrant, says Paul Firth

Every magistrate in the land would do well to heed the lessons learnt from the judgment in Redknapp v City of London Police [2008] EWHC 1177 (Admin), [2008] All ER (D) 319 (May) in relation to the issue and execution of search warrants.

On 19 November 2007 warrants were issued under s 8 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE 1984) to search eight premises, including the home address of Portsmouth FC manager, Harry Redknapp. The warrants were executed in the early hours of 29 November and were the subject of judicial review proceedings determined by the High Court on 23 May 2008.

Judicial review of search warrants is a rare procedure. In the Redknapp case, the procedure itself prevented the court from coming to a detailed judgment on some matters. Evidence or a lack of evidence played a significant role, not least because there were central evidential

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll