header-logo header-logo

A slipshod execution

19 June 2008 / Paul Firth
Issue: 7326 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Community care
printer mail-detail

Post Redknapp, police and magistrates should appreciate the gravity of requests for a search warrant, says Paul Firth

Every magistrate in the land would do well to heed the lessons learnt from the judgment in Redknapp v City of London Police [2008] EWHC 1177 (Admin), [2008] All ER (D) 319 (May) in relation to the issue and execution of search warrants.

On 19 November 2007 warrants were issued under s 8 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE 1984) to search eight premises, including the home address of Portsmouth FC manager, Harry Redknapp. The warrants were executed in the early hours of 29 November and were the subject of judicial review proceedings determined by the High Court on 23 May 2008.

Judicial review of search warrants is a rare procedure. In the Redknapp case, the procedure itself prevented the court from coming to a detailed judgment on some matters. Evidence or a lack of evidence played a significant role, not least because there were central evidential

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Law students and graduates can now apply to qualify as solicitors and barristers with the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS)
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
back-to-top-scroll