header-logo header-logo

A small revolution

16 August 2007 / Rosie Choueka
Issue: 7286 / Categories: Features , EU , Competition
printer mail-detail

Why is the European Commission undertaking the wholesale reform of the state aid regime? Rosie Choueka investigates

The Competition Directorate General of the European Commission in Brussels has certainly been busy over the past few years. In addition to its bread-and-butter work of examining mergers, investigating cartels and controlling state subsidies, it has been modernising its policies across all areas of its practice. This has ranged from the de-centralisation of competition law enforcement—placing more responsibility on the shoulders of national competition authorities and more emphasis on self-assessment—through to updating the Merger Regulation 139/2004/EC and addressing the over-formalistic law on abuses of dominance.

Since June 2005, the Commission has also been working to improve the state aid regime. This article examines the reasons for the overhaul of state aid law and policy, the objectives behind it and the progress that has been made so far.

THE NEED FOR REFORM

Given that the state aid regime is mature and well developed, it may seem strange that the Commission has chosen to undertake a wholesale reform

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll