header-logo header-logo

16 August 2007 / Rosie Choueka
Issue: 7286 / Categories: Features , EU , Competition
printer mail-detail

A small revolution

Why is the European Commission undertaking the wholesale reform of the state aid regime? Rosie Choueka investigates

The Competition Directorate General of the European Commission in Brussels has certainly been busy over the past few years. In addition to its bread-and-butter work of examining mergers, investigating cartels and controlling state subsidies, it has been modernising its policies across all areas of its practice. This has ranged from the de-centralisation of competition law enforcement—placing more responsibility on the shoulders of national competition authorities and more emphasis on self-assessment—through to updating the Merger Regulation 139/2004/EC and addressing the over-formalistic law on abuses of dominance.

Since June 2005, the Commission has also been working to improve the state aid regime. This article examines the reasons for the overhaul of state aid law and policy, the objectives behind it and the progress that has been made so far.

THE NEED FOR REFORM

Given that the state aid regime is mature and well developed, it may seem strange that the Commission has chosen to undertake a wholesale reform

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

Mark Hastings, founding partner of Quillon Law, on turning dreams into reality and pushing back on preconceptions about partnership

Kingsley Napley—Silvia Devecchi

Kingsley Napley—Silvia Devecchi

New family law partner for Italian and international clients appointed

Mishcon de Reya—Susannah Kintish

Mishcon de Reya—Susannah Kintish

Firm elects new chair of tier 1 ranked employment department

NEWS
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Digital informality meets hard-edged costs law. In this week's NLJ, David Bailey-Vella, chair of the Association of Costs Lawyers and legal director at Pogust Goodhead, examines MacInnes v DWF Law LLP, in which the Senior Courts Costs Office held that if a firm bills for WhatsApp work, those messages form part of the ‘file’—even if stored on personal devices
The NHS’s safety watchdog may itself need watching. Writing in NLJ this week, John F Mayberry, criminal barrister at 2DRJ, and Affifa Farrukh, consultant physician, examine the sweeping powers granted to the Health Services Safety Investigation Body under the Health and Care Act 2022
back-to-top-scroll