header-logo header-logo

A small revolution

16 August 2007 / Rosie Choueka
Issue: 7286 / Categories: Features , EU , Competition
printer mail-detail

Why is the European Commission undertaking the wholesale reform of the state aid regime? Rosie Choueka investigates

The Competition Directorate General of the European Commission in Brussels has certainly been busy over the past few years. In addition to its bread-and-butter work of examining mergers, investigating cartels and controlling state subsidies, it has been modernising its policies across all areas of its practice. This has ranged from the de-centralisation of competition law enforcement—placing more responsibility on the shoulders of national competition authorities and more emphasis on self-assessment—through to updating the Merger Regulation 139/2004/EC and addressing the over-formalistic law on abuses of dominance.

Since June 2005, the Commission has also been working to improve the state aid regime. This article examines the reasons for the overhaul of state aid law and policy, the objectives behind it and the progress that has been made so far.

THE NEED FOR REFORM

Given that the state aid regime is mature and well developed, it may seem strange that the Commission has chosen to undertake a wholesale reform

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll