header-logo header-logo

Solicitor—Costs—Conditional fee agreement

03 February 2011
Issue: 7451 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Morris and another v Southwark London Borough Council (Law Society intervening) [2011] All ER (D) 183 (Jan), [2011] EWCA Civ 25

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Lord Neuberger MR, Lloyd and Gross LJJ, 25 Jan 2011

A conditional fee agreement (CFA) providing for the claimant’s solicitors to indemnify her against payment of the defendant’s costs if the claim was dismissed is not champertous or otherwise contrary to public policy. It will therefore not invalidate a CFA which otherwise complies with s 58 of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990.

Mark James (instructed by Belshaw & Curtin) for the claimants. Roger Mallalieu (instructed by Director of Communities Law and Governance, London Borough of Southwark) for the authority.  David Holland (instructed by the Law Society) for the interveners.

Two appeals before the court arose out of claims by residential tenants against the local authority landlord concerning alleged breaches of the landlord’s covenant. The claimants entered into a contract of engagement, which was a CFA with a 10% success fee. It also included the statement that: “If

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll