header-logo header-logo

03 February 2011
Issue: 7451 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Solicitor—Costs—Conditional fee agreement

Morris and another v Southwark London Borough Council (Law Society intervening) [2011] All ER (D) 183 (Jan), [2011] EWCA Civ 25

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Lord Neuberger MR, Lloyd and Gross LJJ, 25 Jan 2011

A conditional fee agreement (CFA) providing for the claimant’s solicitors to indemnify her against payment of the defendant’s costs if the claim was dismissed is not champertous or otherwise contrary to public policy. It will therefore not invalidate a CFA which otherwise complies with s 58 of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990.

Mark James (instructed by Belshaw & Curtin) for the claimants. Roger Mallalieu (instructed by Director of Communities Law and Governance, London Borough of Southwark) for the authority.  David Holland (instructed by the Law Society) for the interveners.

Two appeals before the court arose out of claims by residential tenants against the local authority landlord concerning alleged breaches of the landlord’s covenant. The claimants entered into a contract of engagement, which was a CFA with a 10% success fee. It also included the statement that: “If

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll