header-logo header-logo

24 May 2012
Issue: 7515 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Solicitor—Duty—Duty of confidentiality to the client

Singla v Stockler and another [2012] EWHC 1176 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 100 (May)
Chancery Division, Briggs J, 10 May 2012

Where a solicitor acts on a joint retainer by two or more clients in relation to the same matter, subject to any agreement between them to the contrary, there is generally no obligation on the solicitor to keep his communications with one of those clients confidential from the other; his obligation of confidence to his joint clients can only be released by all of them acting together.

Reuben Comiskey (instructed by Stephenson Harwood) for the claimant. Donald Lilly (instructed by Stockler Brunton) for the defendants.

The claimant was an insolvency practitioner. He retained the defendants as his solicitors in litigation which he undertook as liquidator of a company (9 MD) against a former director of 9 MD (the English proceedings). The claimant alleged that the defendants also provided legal advice and assistance to him, albeit falling short of a formal retainer, in connection with proceedings brought against

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll