header-logo header-logo

Solicitor—Duty—Duty of confidentiality to the client

24 May 2012
Issue: 7515 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Singla v Stockler and another [2012] EWHC 1176 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 100 (May)
Chancery Division, Briggs J, 10 May 2012

Where a solicitor acts on a joint retainer by two or more clients in relation to the same matter, subject to any agreement between them to the contrary, there is generally no obligation on the solicitor to keep his communications with one of those clients confidential from the other; his obligation of confidence to his joint clients can only be released by all of them acting together.

Reuben Comiskey (instructed by Stephenson Harwood) for the claimant. Donald Lilly (instructed by Stockler Brunton) for the defendants.

The claimant was an insolvency practitioner. He retained the defendants as his solicitors in litigation which he undertook as liquidator of a company (9 MD) against a former director of 9 MD (the English proceedings). The claimant alleged that the defendants also provided legal advice and assistance to him, albeit falling short of a formal retainer, in connection with proceedings brought against

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll