header-logo header-logo

Solicitor—Duty—Duty of confidentiality to the client

24 May 2012
Issue: 7515 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Singla v Stockler and another [2012] EWHC 1176 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 100 (May)
Chancery Division, Briggs J, 10 May 2012

Where a solicitor acts on a joint retainer by two or more clients in relation to the same matter, subject to any agreement between them to the contrary, there is generally no obligation on the solicitor to keep his communications with one of those clients confidential from the other; his obligation of confidence to his joint clients can only be released by all of them acting together.

Reuben Comiskey (instructed by Stephenson Harwood) for the claimant. Donald Lilly (instructed by Stockler Brunton) for the defendants.

The claimant was an insolvency practitioner. He retained the defendants as his solicitors in litigation which he undertook as liquidator of a company (9 MD) against a former director of 9 MD (the English proceedings). The claimant alleged that the defendants also provided legal advice and assistance to him, albeit falling short of a formal retainer, in connection with proceedings brought against

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dispute resolution team welcomes associate in London

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Special education needs and mental capacity expert joins as partner

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll