header-logo header-logo

15 December 2011
Issue: 7494 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Solicitors

Amin and another v Imran Khan & Partners [2011] EWHC 2958 (QB), [2011] All ER (D) 34 (Dec)

It was overwhelmingly probable that if negligence had not occurred on the part of the solicitor and the claim had been properly pursued, settlement in the region of £75,000 would have been secured. The chance of securing such a settlement was lost as a result of the solicitor’s negligence. If the matter had not been settled but had proceeded to trial, the claimant lost the opportunity of achieving an award of about £75,000. Accordingly, the claimant had to recover the value of the chance lost as a result of the solicitor’s negligence, namely a valuable settlement of the claim in the sum of £75,000.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

19 promotions across national offices, including two new partners

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Partner promoted to head of corporate team

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Chester office expansion accelerates with triple appointment

NEWS
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has reignited debate over what exactly counts as the ‘conduct of litigation’ in modern legal practice
A controversial High Court financial remedies ruling has reignited debate over secrecy, non-disclosure and fairness in divorce proceedings involving hidden wealth
Britain’s deferred prosecution agreement regime is undergoing a significant shift, with prosecutors placing renewed emphasis on corporate cooperation, reform and early self-reporting
The High Court has upheld the Metropolitan Police’s live facial recognition policy, rejecting claims that its deployment unlawfully interferes with privacy and protest rights
As AI chatbots increasingly provide legal and commercial advice, English law is beginning to confront who should bear responsibility when automated systems get things wrong
back-to-top-scroll