header-logo header-logo

Solicitors braced for one-off levy

01 November 2023
Issue: 8047 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
Solicitors must be consulted before any decision is taken to impose a one-off levy to bolster the compensation fund, the Law Society has said

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) revealed in October that it was considering a levy to raise funds for losses arising from the collapses of Axiom Ince, Metamorph and Kingly. The compensation fund, which protect clients, has £18m in its reserves, which is unlikely to cover fund payouts concerning the firms. The SRA closed down Axiom last month, the Metamorph group in January and Kingly in August 2020. 

However, Law Society chief executive Ian Jeffery said this week: ‘We are of course greatly concerned that our members could be asked to plug a gap of many millions of pounds in the compensation fund arising from the collapse of just three law firms, which were set up under atypical business models and with their own clear and inherent risks.

‘We would expect the solicitor profession to be consulted before any decision is made by the SRA on its approach to these exceptional compensation questions, given that our members would be required to pay for it and it is their collective reputation at stake. As a representative body we recognise that regulatory decisions are by law a matter for the SRA, but we have a role to be assured that the SRA complies with its statutory duty and the regulatory principles guiding any regulatory action which must be transparent, accountable, proportionate, consistent and targeted.’

SRA Board chair Anna Bradley, in a post last week on her reflections on the board’s October meeting, said the ‘big increase’ in the number of interventions meant an interim levy was being considered and an increase in levies overall was likely. Bradley wrote: ‘We recognise that would have a big impact on firms, particularly smaller, high-street solicitors.’

Issue: 8047 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll