header-logo header-logo

Solicitors Indemnity Fund decision a "real concern"

31 March 2016
Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The decision not to extend post-six-year run-off protection after 2020 despite a recent surge in such claims presents a “real concern” for partners, Legal Risk partner Frank Maher has warned.

Currently, any firm that has closed since September 2000 without a successor can resort to the old Solicitors Indemnity Fund (SIF) for any claim made after the six-year run-off period. This arrangement is due to end in 2020. SIF closed in 2000.

The SIF says it has recently “noted a significant increase in post six year run-off claims in both frequency and value requiring adjustment to its ultimate expected liability positions".

“This means that although SIF has sufficient financial resources to meet all expected claims up to 30 September 2020, its surplus is unlikely to be sufficient to fund any further extension beyond that date. This has been taken into account by the SRA in reaching its decision.”

Frank Maher, partner at Legal Risk, says: “The statement from SIF serves as an important reminder for law firms, and particularly those retiring or selling their practices, to take a strategic approach to managing the long-tail liabilities to which they are exposed. 

“It is also a real concern for partners in the ever-increasing numbers of insolvent law firms. As SIF’s comment illustrates, liability may be way beyond six years. It emphasises the need for incorporation and great care in effectively limiting liability and the scope of their duties. 

“But even that cannot prevent claims being made. There are particular risks for private client lawyers who may have taken personal appointments as executors or trustees.”

Despite calls from the Law Society to extend SIF cover by a further three years to 2023, The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Board decided to stick with its 2020 deadline.

Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

BCL Solicitors—Robert Lawrie

BCL Solicitors—Robert Lawrie

Commercial disputes team lead promoted to partner

Mourant—Tom Fothergill

Mourant—Tom Fothergill

Jersey finance and corporate practice welcomes new partner

Shakespeare Martineau—Solicitor apprentices

Shakespeare Martineau—Solicitor apprentices

Firm launches solicitor apprenticeship programme with inaugural cohort

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll