header-logo header-logo

Solicitors told to steer clear of unregulated claims managers

27 April 2007
Issue: 7270 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Regulatory , Profession
printer mail-detail

Solicitors dealing with unregulated claims referral companies or claims management companies could face disciplinary sanctions or even prosecution from this week.

Regulation of claims management services—which was brought in by the Compensation Act 2006 and is backed by criminal sanctions—came into force on Monday.

Solicitors have been warned by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) to check the status of any claims management company which provides their firm with regulated claims management services.

SRA chair Peter Williamson says: “We expect solicitors to take care that they are only using companies which are properly regulated. These are important measures designed to protect the public from claims farmers who have been using unscrupulous tactics and aggressive selling techniques.”

Claims management companies must comply with new rules of conduct covering advertising, marketing and soliciting of business. For example, clients must be given certain information before they sign a contract and there is a duty to have a complaints procedure.

Mark Boleat, head of claims management regulation at the Department for Constitutional Affairs, says: “We will be closely managing the activities of claims management businesses and will not hesitate to take regulatory action where necessary.”

Issue: 7270 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Regulatory , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll