header-logo header-logo

Solicitors’ warning on criminal rates

07 December 2022
Issue: 8006 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail
Criminal law solicitors could follow the Bar’s example and down tools following justice secretary Dominic Raab’s final response to the Independent Review of Criminal Legal Aid.

The review, led by Lord Bellamy and published last December, recommended as a minimum an immediate 15% rise in criminal legal aid rates across the board. One year later, however, Raab last week published his full response, offering an extra £138m for the legal aid sector as a whole, including ‘raising the overall package [for solicitors] from 9% to 11%’.

In contrast, the government offered a 15% increase for the vast majority of Crown Court cases as part of a deal to end Criminal Bar strikes in September.

Law Society president Lubna Shuja said: ‘Having seen that direct action gets results, the response from some of our members may be to resort to disruptive tactics.

‘But far more worrying than any disruption caused by short-term action is the continued loss of criminal defence solicitors which is already leaving parts of the criminal justice system wholly unable to cope with the demands on it. This will get even worse across more areas of England and Wales. It will be far more costly to fix if we get that far.

‘We are still exploring options for saving the system, including a legal challenge of the decision.’

Law Society analysis suggests the number of duty solicitors will decrease by another 19% by 2025 (687 fewer duty solicitors) and the number of firms doing criminal legal aid work will decrease by 16% (150 fewer firms), leaving many people without access to a lawyer.

Shuja issued a stark warning to those considering a career in criminal defence practice, saying ‘it is highly unlikely that you will be able to generate a reasonable professional income from this work’. She highlighted that solicitors are under a regulatory duty to ensure they manage risks to the financial stability and business viability of their practices.

Mark Fenhalls KC, chair of the Bar, said: ‘The criminal justice system only works when the whole system works.

‘Our solicitor colleagues are clear that this announcement risks significant flight from criminal legal aid by solicitors which would leave the system in danger of collapse.’

Issue: 8006 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll