header-logo header-logo

07 December 2022
Issue: 8006 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Solicitors’ warning on criminal rates

Criminal law solicitors could follow the Bar’s example and down tools following justice secretary Dominic Raab’s final response to the Independent Review of Criminal Legal Aid.

The review, led by Lord Bellamy and published last December, recommended as a minimum an immediate 15% rise in criminal legal aid rates across the board. One year later, however, Raab last week published his full response, offering an extra £138m for the legal aid sector as a whole, including ‘raising the overall package [for solicitors] from 9% to 11%’.

In contrast, the government offered a 15% increase for the vast majority of Crown Court cases as part of a deal to end Criminal Bar strikes in September.

Law Society president Lubna Shuja said: ‘Having seen that direct action gets results, the response from some of our members may be to resort to disruptive tactics.

‘But far more worrying than any disruption caused by short-term action is the continued loss of criminal defence solicitors which is already leaving parts of the criminal justice system wholly unable to cope with the demands on it. This will get even worse across more areas of England and Wales. It will be far more costly to fix if we get that far.

‘We are still exploring options for saving the system, including a legal challenge of the decision.’

Law Society analysis suggests the number of duty solicitors will decrease by another 19% by 2025 (687 fewer duty solicitors) and the number of firms doing criminal legal aid work will decrease by 16% (150 fewer firms), leaving many people without access to a lawyer.

Shuja issued a stark warning to those considering a career in criminal defence practice, saying ‘it is highly unlikely that you will be able to generate a reasonable professional income from this work’. She highlighted that solicitors are under a regulatory duty to ensure they manage risks to the financial stability and business viability of their practices.

Mark Fenhalls KC, chair of the Bar, said: ‘The criminal justice system only works when the whole system works.

‘Our solicitor colleagues are clear that this announcement risks significant flight from criminal legal aid by solicitors which would leave the system in danger of collapse.’

Issue: 8006 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll