header-logo header-logo

Solicitors’ warning on criminal rates

07 December 2022
Issue: 8006 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail
Criminal law solicitors could follow the Bar’s example and down tools following justice secretary Dominic Raab’s final response to the Independent Review of Criminal Legal Aid.

The review, led by Lord Bellamy and published last December, recommended as a minimum an immediate 15% rise in criminal legal aid rates across the board. One year later, however, Raab last week published his full response, offering an extra £138m for the legal aid sector as a whole, including ‘raising the overall package [for solicitors] from 9% to 11%’.

In contrast, the government offered a 15% increase for the vast majority of Crown Court cases as part of a deal to end Criminal Bar strikes in September.

Law Society president Lubna Shuja said: ‘Having seen that direct action gets results, the response from some of our members may be to resort to disruptive tactics.

‘But far more worrying than any disruption caused by short-term action is the continued loss of criminal defence solicitors which is already leaving parts of the criminal justice system wholly unable to cope with the demands on it. This will get even worse across more areas of England and Wales. It will be far more costly to fix if we get that far.

‘We are still exploring options for saving the system, including a legal challenge of the decision.’

Law Society analysis suggests the number of duty solicitors will decrease by another 19% by 2025 (687 fewer duty solicitors) and the number of firms doing criminal legal aid work will decrease by 16% (150 fewer firms), leaving many people without access to a lawyer.

Shuja issued a stark warning to those considering a career in criminal defence practice, saying ‘it is highly unlikely that you will be able to generate a reasonable professional income from this work’. She highlighted that solicitors are under a regulatory duty to ensure they manage risks to the financial stability and business viability of their practices.

Mark Fenhalls KC, chair of the Bar, said: ‘The criminal justice system only works when the whole system works.

‘Our solicitor colleagues are clear that this announcement risks significant flight from criminal legal aid by solicitors which would leave the system in danger of collapse.’

Issue: 8006 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll