header-logo header-logo

Solving the family expert shortage

06 November 2020
Categories: Legal News , Family , Profession , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail
The shrinking pool of family experts could be addressed by providing clinical and social work professionals with online training courses, paying judges to provide training and amending legal aid guidance on payment provision

These are among 22 recommendations made in the final report of the Working Group on Medical Experts in the Family Courts, published this week.

Other suggestions include greater engagement of professional bodies, making court paperwork and processes more efficient and improving local and regional co-ordination.

The report suggests that barristers, solicitors and judges be approached to assist with witness training, perhaps in conjunction with accredited training organisations. ‘Judges should be permitted to assist with training in working time and barristers and solicitors should be paid,’ it states. ‘The aim of this should not only be to assist the experts to give their best evidence, but also to dispel some of the anxieties many have about cross examination and the attitudes of the courts.’

The report uncovered one positive from the COVID-19 pandemic―remote hearings made attendance at court hearings less disruptive of clinical practice.

Sir Andrew McFarlane, President of the Family Division, said it had become ‘increasingly difficult’ in recent years to find experts willing to give evidence in family cases.

‘The shortage has not only been of clinical experts but also allied health professionals and independent social workers,’ he said.

‘Expert evidence is often necessary in order to decide cases justly and the reduction in available experts therefore presents a serious problem.’

The report notes: ‘Providing reports to the family courts is hugely time consuming and requires meticulous scrutiny of medical records and radiological imaging.

‘Psychological assessments often require consideration of medical and social services records. With the complexities and demands of practicing in the modern NHS, it is perhaps not surprising that few individuals are willing to take on the challenges of being a medical expert.’

Sir Andrew set up a working group of legal and health professionals, under Mr Justice David Williams, in autumn 2018, to investigate what could be done to resolve the issue.

View the report at: bit.ly/354N3hb.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—Michael Conway

Birketts—Michael Conway

IP partner joins team in Bristol to lead branding and trade marks practice

Blake Morgan—Daniel Church

Blake Morgan—Daniel Church

Succession and tax team welcomes partner inLondon

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec

Firm appoints senior associate to lead Manchester city centre team

NEWS
Ministers’ proposals to raise funds by seizing interest on lawyers’ client account schemes could ‘cause firms to close’, solicitors have warned
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
Pension sharing orders (PSOs) have quietly reached their 25th anniversary, yet remain stubbornly underused. Writing in NLJ this week, Joanna Newton of Stowe Family Law argues that this neglect risks long-term financial harm, particularly for women
A school ski trip, a confiscated phone and an unauthorised hotel-room entry culminated in a pupil’s permanent exclusion. In this week's issue of NLJ, Nicholas Dobson charts how the Court of Appeal upheld the decision despite acknowledged procedural flaws
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
back-to-top-scroll