header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
26 July 2007 / Stephen Mayson
Issue: 7283 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Something for everyone?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

It is time to rethink the delivery of legal services, says Professor Stephen Mayson

A key part of the Legal Services Bill is the proposal for alternative business structures (ABSs). The legal structures that ABSs might adopt—such as partnership, limited liability partnership, limited company or public limited company—already exist. There are no alternative structures in this sense.
What the Bill sets out is simply a licensing framework for businesses carrying out reserved legal activities where 10% or more of the ownership or management of those businesses is under the control of non-lawyers. These structures are alternatives to the ownership of law firms only by qualified lawyers. In allowing these alternatives, it will encourage a different combination of services and products alongside legal advice, as well as different ways of delivering them to clients.

LEGAL DISCIPLINARY PRACTICES

Sir David Clementi’s idea of legal disciplinary practices (LDPs) in his Review of the Regulatory Framework for Legal Services in England and Wales was not incorporated into the ABS provisions. LDPs would allow “lawyers” from different backgrounds, such

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

Financial services and regulatory offering boosted by partner hires

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When ‘milk’ really means milk
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
NLJ this week: Civil practice with claws & caution
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
NLJ this week: Stealing virtual gold?
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
NLJ this week: Don’t let your LPA gather dust
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
NLJ this week: Neutral counsel in a polarised age
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll