header-logo header-logo

South Africa v Israel: A dilemma for the ICJ

02 February 2024 / Marc Weller
Issue: 8057 / Categories: Features , Profession , International
printer mail-detail
156462
As the court orders Israel to prevent genocidal acts, Marc Weller analyses the decision, the response & its implications
  • The court faced a dilemma in this highly political case. But it has decided a long list of cases involving the use of force between states.
  • The court did not formally conclude that Israel has engaged in acts of genocide. Rather, it found that South Africa could plausibly argue that the conduct falls within the ambit of the Genocide Convention.
  • Even though there was no cease-fire order, the case has important ramifications for the conflict.

International law has made the global headlines again. The eagerly anticipated preliminary measures order rendered by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the Gaza genocide case brought by South Africa against Israel has commanded world-wide attention. As could be expected, the decision has received a mixed reception.

The President of South Africa, Cyril Ramaphosa, immediately hailed the decision as a victory for international law, for his country and for Palestine. Israeli

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Mourant—Stephen Alexander

Mourant—Stephen Alexander

Jersey litigation lead appointed to global STEP Council

mfg Solicitors—nine trainees

mfg Solicitors—nine trainees

Firm invests in future talent with new training cohort

NEWS
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
back-to-top-scroll