header-logo header-logo

Specialist support service to end

13 June 2012
Issue: 7518 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

LSC to close its specialist support service in July

The Legal Services Commission (LSC) is to close its specialist support service, through which law centres, legal aid law firms and legal advice agencies can telephone a legal expert for help.

Current contracts for the service are due to end on 30 June, but the scheme has been extended by another week to give the service time to wind down.

The service provides “second-tier support” via telephone and e-mail to advice agencies and legal aid law firms working in the areas of welfare benefits, housing, debt, employment, community care, immigration, mental health and public law.

It was set up in 2008, and cost the LSC between £1.1m and £1.65m to run annually. While the largest contractor worked double the hours expected, five of the other eight contractors reported under-usage of the service.

The LSC had planned to close the service in March, but backed down after the Public Law Project issued judicial review proceedings. It then extended the contracts for a further three months and launched a consultation.

Last week, however, the LSC announced the end for the service, saying that, having considered the response to its consultation, it had decided there were suitable alternatives for dealing with complex queries, such as instructing counsel or referring the matter to a specialist adviser.

It pointed out that the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 reduces the legal aid scope of five of the eight categories of coverage, and that the government has made clear that it intends to reduce the legal aid bill by £350m by 2014-2015.

Eight organisations are contracted to provide the service — Citizens Advice, Shelter, virtual law firm Scott-Moncrieff, the PLP, London firm Wilson & Co, the Child Poverty Action Group, the London Advice Services Alliance and Shelter Cymru.

Issue: 7518 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll