header-logo header-logo

SQE coming in 2021

14 November 2018
Issue: 7817 / Categories: Legal News , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

The Solicitors Qualifying Examination (SQE) will be introduced in autumn 2021, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has confirmed. The candidate fee is likely to range between £3,000–£4,500. SQE’s launch has been pushed back a year in response to feedback gathered from universities and law firms, who wanted more time to prepare. The exam will be in two parts, the first testing legal knowledge and the second testing practical legal skills. Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said SQE ‘offers a fresh opportunity to increase access to the profession’.

Issue: 7817 / Categories: Legal News , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll