header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
24 April 2015 / David Burrows
Issue: 7649 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Start the clock

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_24_04_15_burrows

When does a contractual retainer arise & when does legal advice privilege apply, asks David Burrows

At what point in a case can it be said that what a person has said to a lawyer—solicitor or barrister—is covered by the confidentiality of legal advice privilege (LAP). At what point is the lawyer’s insurer on risk? Are these two dates the same; and is this the date from which a lawyer’s retainer contract operates?

In these times of close regulation where a lawyer’s every move—or so it often seems—is capable of review by a regulatory body a surprising feature of outcomes focused regulation (the style of the new SRA Code of Conduct 2011 ) is that the Solicitors Regulation Authority seems not to know when its regulatory reign over a lawyer begins. The regulators have no barometer of which I am aware by which they can measure the critical moment at which lawyers are clearly within their regulatory clutches; nor does the SRA regard itself as having any arbitral role in defining this point. It seems

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll