header-logo header-logo

Start the clock

24 April 2015 / David Burrows
Issue: 7649 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
nlj_24_04_15_burrows

When does a contractual retainer arise & when does legal advice privilege apply, asks David Burrows

At what point in a case can it be said that what a person has said to a lawyer—solicitor or barrister—is covered by the confidentiality of legal advice privilege (LAP). At what point is the lawyer’s insurer on risk? Are these two dates the same; and is this the date from which a lawyer’s retainer contract operates?

In these times of close regulation where a lawyer’s every move—or so it often seems—is capable of review by a regulatory body a surprising feature of outcomes focused regulation (the style of the new SRA Code of Conduct 2011 ) is that the Solicitors Regulation Authority seems not to know when its regulatory reign over a lawyer begins. The regulators have no barometer of which I am aware by which they can measure the critical moment at which lawyers are clearly within their regulatory clutches; nor does the SRA regard itself as having any arbitral role in defining this point. It seems

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ben Daniels, DAC Beachcroft

NLJ Career Profile: Ben Daniels, DAC Beachcroft

Ben Daniels, newly elected as the next senior partner of DAC Beachcroft, reflects on his leadership inspiration and considers an impish alternative career

Osbornes Law—Lee Henderson

Osbornes Law—Lee Henderson

Family team bolstered by latest partner hire

Freeths—Graeme Danby & John Jeffreys

Freeths—Graeme Danby & John Jeffreys

Firms strengthens national restructuring and insolvency practice with leadership appointments

NEWS
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
In NLJ this week, Ian Smith, emeritus professor at UEA, explores major developments in employment law from the Supreme Court and appellate courts
Writing in NLJ this week, Kamran Rehman and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Operafund Eco-Invest SICAV plc v Spain, where the Commercial Court held that ICSID and Energy Charter Treaty awards cannot be assigned
Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School highlights a turbulent end to 2025 in the civil courts, from the looming appeal in Mazur to judicial frustration with ever-expanding bundles, in his final NLJ 'The insider' column of the year
back-to-top-scroll