header-logo header-logo

24 April 2015 / David Burrows
Issue: 7649 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Start the clock

nlj_24_04_15_burrows

When does a contractual retainer arise & when does legal advice privilege apply, asks David Burrows

At what point in a case can it be said that what a person has said to a lawyer—solicitor or barrister—is covered by the confidentiality of legal advice privilege (LAP). At what point is the lawyer’s insurer on risk? Are these two dates the same; and is this the date from which a lawyer’s retainer contract operates?

In these times of close regulation where a lawyer’s every move—or so it often seems—is capable of review by a regulatory body a surprising feature of outcomes focused regulation (the style of the new SRA Code of Conduct 2011 ) is that the Solicitors Regulation Authority seems not to know when its regulatory reign over a lawyer begins. The regulators have no barometer of which I am aware by which they can measure the critical moment at which lawyers are clearly within their regulatory clutches; nor does the SRA regard itself as having any arbitral role in defining this point. It seems

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll