header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
24 April 2015 / David Burrows
Issue: 7649 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Start the clock

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_24_04_15_burrows

When does a contractual retainer arise & when does legal advice privilege apply, asks David Burrows

At what point in a case can it be said that what a person has said to a lawyer—solicitor or barrister—is covered by the confidentiality of legal advice privilege (LAP). At what point is the lawyer’s insurer on risk? Are these two dates the same; and is this the date from which a lawyer’s retainer contract operates?

In these times of close regulation where a lawyer’s every move—or so it often seems—is capable of review by a regulatory body a surprising feature of outcomes focused regulation (the style of the new SRA Code of Conduct 2011 ) is that the Solicitors Regulation Authority seems not to know when its regulatory reign over a lawyer begins. The regulators have no barometer of which I am aware by which they can measure the critical moment at which lawyers are clearly within their regulatory clutches; nor does the SRA regard itself as having any arbitral role in defining this point. It seems

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll