header-logo header-logo

State of the courts—leaky, freezing and with dodgy WiFi

19 December 2022
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail
One solicitor had a piece of air conditioning fall on their head at a magistrate’s court in Manchester, while another solicitor reports from a London Crown Court that ‘everything is falling apart… ceilings leak, toilets leak… mould everywhere’.

At Birkenhead, ‘half the building has fallen down and the other half is closed due to asbestos’. One Brighton solicitor said: ‘The standards of cleanliness, access to drinking water, heating/air conditioning and physical infrastructure are appalling. Bio security is haphazard or non-existent. Access to internet is not reliable.’

These and other findings are included in a devastating report on the state of court buildings and infrastructure in England and Wales, 'Justice delayed: 5 steps to resolve the backlogs in our courts', published this week by the Law Society. Two-thirds of solicitors responding to a survey have experienced delays in cases being heard in the past 12 months due to the physical state of the courts.

The steps set out in the report are: first, invest in repairing buildings and recruiting enough staff and judges to help prevent delays; second, properly fund legal aid by raising civil rates for the first time since 1996 and implementing the recommended 15% rise in criminal rates; third, fund legal aid for early advice and bring back legal aid for advice on housing, debt, welfare benefits and family law, as this stops large amounts of cases going to court.

Fourth, the Law Society report suggests installing reliable technology to drive efficiency and only rolling out tech once it is known to be reliable—only 13% of respondents in London felt technology was fit for purpose. Solicitors report not being able to link to the network, the sound being too low, and tech experiencing glitches or not working at all.

Fifth, the Law Society calls for better data collection throughout the courts to show where investment or interventions are needed, particularly on the impact of digital tech and remote hearings on justice outcomes.

Lubna Shuja, president of the Law Society, said: ‘The backlog in our Crown Courts stands at more than 62,000 cases, while care cases in the family court take on average 49 weeks to be dealt with.

‘Behind each of these statistics are tens of thousands of people caught in limbo, their lives on hold as they await their day in court.

HM Courts and Tribunals Service is aware the court estate needs fixing and urgently needs to put into practice the steps set out to make that improvement.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll