header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
17 March 2017 / David Burrows
Issue: 7738 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Statutory charge or Pyrrhic damages?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Does the legal aid statutory charge apply to damages recovered by children & their parents under the Human Rights Act 1998, asks David Burrows
  • When does the legal aid statutory charge apply in family proceedings?
  • When does the charge apply as between parallel care proceedings and claims for damages under Human Rights Act 1998, s 8?
  • Can damages claims under s 8 be issued in the family courts?

A difference of view has been developing between two Family Division judges—Cobb J and Keehan J—over whether the legal aid statutory charge applies to damages recovered by children and their parents under the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA1998), s 8. And, rather than holding the ring, the Lord Chancellor (ie Legal Aid Agency (LAA)) does not seem to know which way to jump (see P v A Local Authority [2016] EWHC 2779 (Fam), [2016] All ER (D) 104 (Nov) as against H (A Minor) v Northamptonshire County Council & Anor [2017] EWHC 282 (Fam), [2017] All ER (D) 181 (Feb) both cases of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026—the winners!
The winners of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026 have now been announced, marking another outstanding celebration of excellence, innovation, and impact across the legal profession
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll