header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Statutory charge or Pyrrhic damages?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
17 March 2017 / David Burrows
Issue: 7738 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Does the legal aid statutory charge apply to damages recovered by children & their parents under the Human Rights Act 1998, asks David Burrows
  • When does the legal aid statutory charge apply in family proceedings?
  • When does the charge apply as between parallel care proceedings and claims for damages under Human Rights Act 1998, s 8?
  • Can damages claims under s 8 be issued in the family courts?

A difference of view has been developing between two Family Division judges—Cobb J and Keehan J—over whether the legal aid statutory charge applies to damages recovered by children and their parents under the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA1998), s 8. And, rather than holding the ring, the Lord Chancellor (ie Legal Aid Agency (LAA)) does not seem to know which way to jump (see P v A Local Authority [2016] EWHC 2779 (Fam), [2016] All ER (D) 104 (Nov) as against H (A Minor) v Northamptonshire County Council & Anor [2017] EWHC 282 (Fam), [2017] All ER (D) 181 (Feb) both cases of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Small firms call for tech clarity as AI looms
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Traders’ convictions quashed in Libor shock
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
NLJ this week: Fraud claims climb as courts brace for AI threats
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
NLJ this week: Pro bono power without the red tape
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Trans pool player loses discrimination fight
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll