header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Statutory instrument—Validity—Order in Council

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
03 March 2011
Issue: 7455 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

R v Forsyth and another [2011] UKSC 9, [2011] All ER (D) 248 (Feb)

Supreme Court, Lord Hope DP, Lord Rodger, Lord Walker, Lady Hale and Lord Brown SCJJ, 23 Feb 2011

The power to create criminal offences pursuant to s 46 of the United Nations Act 1946 (UN 1946) is not constrained by time to be lawfully exercisable only at or about the time of the relevant Security Council Resolution.

John Kelsey-Fry QC and Jonathan Barnard (Instructed by BCL Burton Copeland) for the first defendant. Nicholas Purnell QC and Clare Sibson (Instructed by Kingsley Napley) for the second defendant. Philip Mott QC, Peter Blair QC and Peter Finnigan QC (Instructed by Serious Fraud Office) for the prosecution.

The defendants were charged with, inter alia, making funds available to Iraq, contrary to Arts 3(a) and 11(4) of the Iraq (United Nations Sanctions) Order 2000, SI 2000/3241 (the 2000 Order), which was an Order in Council made under powers conferred by s 1 of UN 1946. Pursuant to that Act, the Government had the power to apply

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Law Society calls for clarity on AML
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: Turning corporate liability into opportunity
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
NLJ this week: A prince no more?
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
NLJ this week: Shareholder secrecy sunk
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
NLJ this week: The expanding remit of national security law
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll