header-logo header-logo

Steering an anti-bribery course

22 September 2017
Issue: 6672 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

More than half of multinationals fail to carry out full anti-bribery and corruption checks during M&A talks, according to new research by Hogan Lovells.

However, 64% believe the biggest bribery and corruption risks occur during M&A. The report, Steering the Course, is based on interviews with 604 heads of legal and equivalent in the UK, US, Asia, France and Germany.

Crispin Rapinet, global head of investigations at Hogan Lovells, said: ‘Too few companies do enough to counter bribery and corruption in M&A and private equity investments. Instead they busy themselves with due diligence on tax, antitrust, legal, financial, intellectual property, and other asset or industry-specific areas. None of which makes a difference if the company you’re after is corrupt.’

Issue: 6672 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll