header-logo header-logo

A step in the right direction

25 July 2014 / Andrea Leadsom
Issue: 7616 / Categories: Opinion , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail
comment_leadsom

Andrea Leadsom MP welcomes the consensus to bring insurance contract law into the 21st century

The Insurance Bill introduced to Parliament last week updates some important elements of insurance law—currently set out in the Marine Insurance Act 1906 (MIA 1906), which embodies principles developed in the 18th and 19th centuries. Existing legislation is outdated and does not reflect the commercial expectations of many businesses seeking to buy insurance. This frequently leads to disputes between insurers and policyholders, causing delay, expense and uncertainty. Policyholders cannot always predict whether their insurer will pay out or rely on technical legal arguments to deny claims, which increases the likelihood of policyholders buying insurance based on price alone. This could reduce the quality of insurance products available on the market, which has the potential to undermine the reputation of one of the UK’s leading industries.

The changes the government is introducing mean that British insurers are better equipped to compete against their global competitors, some of whom have already introduced more modern legal regimes for insurance,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll