header-logo header-logo

A step in the right direction

25 July 2014 / Andrea Leadsom
Issue: 7616 / Categories: Opinion , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail
comment_leadsom

Andrea Leadsom MP welcomes the consensus to bring insurance contract law into the 21st century

The Insurance Bill introduced to Parliament last week updates some important elements of insurance law—currently set out in the Marine Insurance Act 1906 (MIA 1906), which embodies principles developed in the 18th and 19th centuries. Existing legislation is outdated and does not reflect the commercial expectations of many businesses seeking to buy insurance. This frequently leads to disputes between insurers and policyholders, causing delay, expense and uncertainty. Policyholders cannot always predict whether their insurer will pay out or rely on technical legal arguments to deny claims, which increases the likelihood of policyholders buying insurance based on price alone. This could reduce the quality of insurance products available on the market, which has the potential to undermine the reputation of one of the UK’s leading industries.

The changes the government is introducing mean that British insurers are better equipped to compete against their global competitors, some of whom have already introduced more modern legal regimes for insurance,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll