header-logo header-logo

18 May 2018 / Mark Sefton , Cecily Crampin
Issue: 7793 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Stepping into the breach?

nlj_7793_sefton_0

Mark Sefton QC & Cecily Crampin discuss alienation, the residential user & Airbnb.

  • A recent case on appeal in the county court at Central London has extended the authorities on covenants in long residential leases likely to be breached by Airbnb use.
  • In Bermondsey Exchange Freeholders Limited v Koumetto such use breached a covenant against parting with possession or permitting occupation by a third party, and a covenant requiring use as a residential flat.

The rise of Airbnb and similar platforms, and their use by long leaseholders of flats, has led to landlord concerns of degradation in the condition of blocks of flats, and complaints by more permanent residents. The courts and tribunals have thus seen many cases with landlords arguing such use is a breach of lease. The issue, in most such cases, is whether alienation and user covenants often drafted long prior to the emergence of Airbnb are sufficiently wide to prohibit Airbnb use.

The first reported case on the issue was Nemcova v Fairfield Rents Ltd [2016] UKUT

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll