header-logo header-logo

Sticking to a budget: could do better?

07 February 2019 / Francis Kendall
Issue: 7827 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

Francis Kendall shares some shocking statistics from the 2018 ACL conference survey

A poll of 146 costs lawyers at the Association of Costs Lawyers’ (ACL’s) annual conference last November showed that only 10% said solicitors have got better at sticking to their budgets. This shocking statistic is perhaps mitigated slightly by the fact that only 23% of those responding said solicitors always went over what was budgeted. However, a further 53% said they sometimes went over.

Although these figures are all improvements on the same survey in 2017 – where the figures were 5%, 29% and 65% respectively – it must be of concern.

Absent success on the “good reason to depart” test on detailed assessment, any costs over budget in a phase reflects work that solicitors are undertaking that will simply never be recovered from the opponent on assessment. They must either know, suspect or are simply ignorant to that position at the time that the work is undertaken.

With clear instructions from a commercial client, I guess

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll