header-logo header-logo

27 September 2024 / Anna Riquetti , Tom Scanlon , Shai Wade
Issue: 8087 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , International , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

Stop. Pause. Go! Re-evaluating the Arbitration Bill & why it's time replace the current Arbitration Act

190804
Anna Riquetti, Tom Scanlon & Shai Wade talk through the proposed amendments & why they hope to see a full replacement of the current Act
  • Analyses the proposed amendments to the Arbitration Bill currently going through Parliament and discusses the need for additional changes.

The English Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996) served well for nearly a quarter of a century. However, over time, a sense developed across the arbitration community that a fresh look at the Act was overdue and a Law Commission review, announced in November 2021, was widely welcomed.

Having concluded that there was no need for a ‘root and branch’ reform of English statutory arbitration law by introducing an entirely new Arbitration Act, the Law Commission recommended revisions and amendments to the Act in six main areas (see box).

You may recall that the recommendations were published in September 2023 and a new Bill was included in the King’s Speech later that year. Further progress was stymied

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll