header-logo header-logo

30 June 2016 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7705 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Stop & search

Nicholas Dobson examines the Supreme Court’s approach to the police stop and search power in s 60 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994

  • Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, s 60 (powers to stop and search in anticipation of or after violence) is compatible with Convention rights in the light of the surrounding statutory and other constraints on its operation.
  • The exercise of public power must be governed by clear and publicly accessible rules of law.
  • The public must not be vulnerable to interference by public officials acting on any personal whim, caprice, malice, predilection or purpose other than that for which the power was conferred.

“Stop in the name of the law!” was apparently a command from the early days of policing. It seems that when approaching a suspect the officer would shout the order. If the suspect then “did a runner” he would be pursued by the policeman, shouting the “stop” command on the hoof while also sounding a police whistle to summon assistance. This would often

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
back-to-top-scroll