header-logo header-logo

29 April 2010 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7415 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

Strange but true

Dominic Regan delves into a selection of gems from the English Law Reports

Naomi Campbell has made a substantial contribution to English law and the mobile phone repair industry. I was captivated by the evidence adduced in Campbell v Frisbee [2002] EWHC 328 Ch.

The defendant was sued for having revealed confidential information about the claimant. Paragraph 8 of the transcript recites the tale of Miss Campbell having spent a night of passion with a famous actor in Berlin. They made love four or five times. When I recounted this impressive statistic to a female friend with a note of hope and optimism in my voice I was told, archly, that it was plainly a misprint. Oh well.

Some judicial statements are unfortunate. In Macdonald v Advocate General [2003], an important case about discrimination on the grounds of homosexuality, I did wonder whether Lord Nicholls might have been better advised not to start paragraph six of the decision with the bold statement: “I prefer to approach the matter from the other end.” Mmmm.

Piping up

While

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll