header-logo header-logo

Strange but true

24 April 2015 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7649 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
nlj_24_04_15_regan

Dominic Regan places judges on the naughty step

Judges are expected to sort out mischief, not make it. The recent decision to dismiss junior members from the bench for watching smut on their office desktop is a sorry story. I was intrigued to learn that the powers that be had satisfied themselves that the material was not illegal. How do you think they were able to do that?

My favourite story in this territory was told by Fred Wedlock, one hit wonder with “The oldest swinger in town”. He recounted the story of the man who on his stag night watched a dubious video which, he sadly discovered, starred his bride-to-be.

Nothing new

There is nothing new about judges saying or doing things that bring the bench into disrepute. The golden age of sharp-tongued judges is now behind us. I had the dubious honour of watching Sir Melford Stevenson in action, trying High Court cases. The most robust barristers were terrified of him. His speciality was utterances that would today have him carted off overnight.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ben Daniels, DAC Beachcroft

NLJ Career Profile: Ben Daniels, DAC Beachcroft

Ben Daniels, newly elected as the next senior partner of DAC Beachcroft, reflects on his leadership inspiration and considers an impish alternative career

Osbornes Law—Lee Henderson

Osbornes Law—Lee Henderson

Family team bolstered by latest partner hire

Freeths—Graeme Danby & John Jeffreys

Freeths—Graeme Danby & John Jeffreys

Firms strengthens national restructuring and insolvency practice with leadership appointments

NEWS
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
In NLJ this week, Ian Smith, emeritus professor at UEA, explores major developments in employment law from the Supreme Court and appellate courts
Writing in NLJ this week, Kamran Rehman and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Operafund Eco-Invest SICAV plc v Spain, where the Commercial Court held that ICSID and Energy Charter Treaty awards cannot be assigned
Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School highlights a turbulent end to 2025 in the civil courts, from the looming appeal in Mazur to judicial frustration with ever-expanding bundles, in his final NLJ 'The insider' column of the year
back-to-top-scroll