header-logo header-logo

24 April 2015 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7649 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Strange but true

nlj_24_04_15_regan

Dominic Regan places judges on the naughty step

Judges are expected to sort out mischief, not make it. The recent decision to dismiss junior members from the bench for watching smut on their office desktop is a sorry story. I was intrigued to learn that the powers that be had satisfied themselves that the material was not illegal. How do you think they were able to do that?

My favourite story in this territory was told by Fred Wedlock, one hit wonder with “The oldest swinger in town”. He recounted the story of the man who on his stag night watched a dubious video which, he sadly discovered, starred his bride-to-be.

Nothing new

There is nothing new about judges saying or doing things that bring the bench into disrepute. The golden age of sharp-tongued judges is now behind us. I had the dubious honour of watching Sir Melford Stevenson in action, trying High Court cases. The most robust barristers were terrified of him. His speciality was utterances that would today have him carted off overnight.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll