header-logo header-logo

24 April 2015 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7649 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Strange but true

nlj_24_04_15_regan

Dominic Regan places judges on the naughty step

Judges are expected to sort out mischief, not make it. The recent decision to dismiss junior members from the bench for watching smut on their office desktop is a sorry story. I was intrigued to learn that the powers that be had satisfied themselves that the material was not illegal. How do you think they were able to do that?

My favourite story in this territory was told by Fred Wedlock, one hit wonder with “The oldest swinger in town”. He recounted the story of the man who on his stag night watched a dubious video which, he sadly discovered, starred his bride-to-be.

Nothing new

There is nothing new about judges saying or doing things that bring the bench into disrepute. The golden age of sharp-tongued judges is now behind us. I had the dubious honour of watching Sir Melford Stevenson in action, trying High Court cases. The most robust barristers were terrified of him. His speciality was utterances that would today have him carted off overnight.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll