header-logo header-logo

08 January 2016 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7681 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Strange but true

nlj_7681_backpage

Dominic Regan casts a playful eye over (judicial) crimes & misdemeanors which made headlines in 2015

What a strange year we had in 2015! The oddity being that the judiciary created the problems rather than resolved them. A vast amount of legal effort was thrown at Coventry and others v Lawrence and another [2015] UKSC 50 [2015] All ER (D) 234 (Jul) which came to nothing. I blame Lord Neuberger. Nothing personal mind. In July 2014 he gave a judgment in the substantive dispute which was about the law of nuisance. In concluding, he wondered aloud whether the conditional fee regime might offend Art 6. It could be said that the other side might be intimidated by the extra costs burden which a successful litigant would inflict. Let us adjourn and hear detailed argument, he directed.

Seven months later, seven judges heard submissions from the 23 barristers in court who were fed fine lines by 15 solicitors. The 5-2 majority found that the system of recoverability, in place since 2000, was not unlawful and so we

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll