header-logo header-logo

Streamlining traffic claims

17 July 2009 / Amanda Stevens
Issue: 7378 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Amanda Stevens asks whether upcoming reforms signify the dawn of a brave new world

For many years now there have been “preliminary discussions” among interested parties about streamlining lower value claims but the government’s consultation paper; Case Track Limits and the Claims Process for Personal Injury Claims published on 20 April 2007, resulted in a frenzy of activity from all stakeholders. The list of respondents runs to 13 pages. Some thought the issues were so complex that the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) had decided to effectively “park” them when there was still no government response a year later.

However, in July 2008 it published guiding principles for the new reforms and have subsequently hosted numerous confidential stakeholder gatherings to thrash out which will in effect be a wholly new process for resolving road traffic claims valued at up to £10,000. No one should mistake the new process as a Predictable Fees Regime Mark II as it represents a complete departure from the existing Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) process. Much training will need to be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll