header-logo header-logo

25 November 2010 / Julian Copeman , Heather Gething
Issue: 7443 / Categories: Features , Public , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

A strictly legal privilege

Julian Copeman & Heather Gething consider the application of privilege in light of the Prudential decision and the impact of the Legal Services Act

The disclosure of documents in English litigation is an important tool which allows the court to do justice between the parties with “all the cards on the table”. It therefore serves the general public policy that cases should be decided by reference to all available evidence. Similarly, in the tax context, the disclosure of documents to HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) enables a fair assessment of the taxpayer’s liability to tax based on a review of all of the relevant evidence.

However, the requirement to disclose relevant documents in litigation or to public authorities is limited by Legal Professional Privilege (LPP), which has long been established in the common law and, more recently, as a fundamental human right protected by the right to privacy under Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. LPP is seen as a necessary corollary of the right of any person

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll