header-logo header-logo

Strike out!

30 April 2009 / James Weale
Issue: 7367 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

What happens when parties don't play by the rules? James Weale reports

* * * * * *
A regrettable but all too common feature of modern litigation is the willingness of parties to frustrate the court's process through a combination of perjury and the suppression and forgery of documents. A strike-out application by the innocent party may be seen as an attractive shortcut to dispose of the other side's case in these circumstances. The unanimous decision of the Court of Appeal in Dadourian Group International v Simms and Ors [2009] EWCA Civ 169, [2009] All ER (D) 175 (Mar), however, demonstrates considerable reluctance on the part of the court to entertain such applications.

Dadourian is the first case in which the Court of Appeal considered its jurisdiction to strike out an appeal notice solely on the basis of subversive conduct on the part of the appellant. The case is also significant for its restrictive interpretation of Arrow Nominees Inc v Blackledge [2001] BCC 591, [2000] All ER (D) 854 in relation to the court's inherent

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll