header-logo header-logo

30 April 2009 / James Weale
Issue: 7367 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Strike out!

What happens when parties don't play by the rules? James Weale reports

* * * * * *
A regrettable but all too common feature of modern litigation is the willingness of parties to frustrate the court's process through a combination of perjury and the suppression and forgery of documents. A strike-out application by the innocent party may be seen as an attractive shortcut to dispose of the other side's case in these circumstances. The unanimous decision of the Court of Appeal in Dadourian Group International v Simms and Ors [2009] EWCA Civ 169, [2009] All ER (D) 175 (Mar), however, demonstrates considerable reluctance on the part of the court to entertain such applications.

Dadourian is the first case in which the Court of Appeal considered its jurisdiction to strike out an appeal notice solely on the basis of subversive conduct on the part of the appellant. The case is also significant for its restrictive interpretation of Arrow Nominees Inc v Blackledge [2001] BCC 591, [2000] All ER (D) 854 in relation to the court's inherent

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll