header-logo header-logo

Strike out!

30 April 2009 / James Weale
Issue: 7367 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

What happens when parties don't play by the rules? James Weale reports

* * * * * *
A regrettable but all too common feature of modern litigation is the willingness of parties to frustrate the court's process through a combination of perjury and the suppression and forgery of documents. A strike-out application by the innocent party may be seen as an attractive shortcut to dispose of the other side's case in these circumstances. The unanimous decision of the Court of Appeal in Dadourian Group International v Simms and Ors [2009] EWCA Civ 169, [2009] All ER (D) 175 (Mar), however, demonstrates considerable reluctance on the part of the court to entertain such applications.

Dadourian is the first case in which the Court of Appeal considered its jurisdiction to strike out an appeal notice solely on the basis of subversive conduct on the part of the appellant. The case is also significant for its restrictive interpretation of Arrow Nominees Inc v Blackledge [2001] BCC 591, [2000] All ER (D) 854 in relation to the court's inherent

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll